Menu
Log in
Log in

    



 

Maine Alliance for Road Associations

Municipal valuation of land in tree growth and cost of repairs/maintenance

  • 23 May 2016 11:09 PM
    Message # 4035681

    Roberta Manter of RoadWays passed this question on to the MARA message board. Any thoughts?

    It reads:

    > According to the last sentence of Title 23 section 3102, "The commissioner's or board's apportioning of the cost of repairs to the road undertaken pursuant to the provisions of section 3101 may not exceed 1% of an individual owner's municipal property valuation in any calendar year."
    > If a landowner has his land in tree growth, does that mean dues are limited to 1% of the tree growth valuation, or can we go by the value before the discount for tree growth? Since land in tree growth will presumably be harvested at intervals, and such activity places a far greater weight burden on the road than passenger cars, it hardly seems fair that the owner of a lot in tree growth should pay less for road maintenance than other landowners. In some cases they might only be paying a few dollars a year.
    > Also, it's kind of ambiguous because 3102 refers to the cost of repairs, but 3101 seems to define maintenance as being separate from repairs. Does that mean we can charge up to 1% of the municipal evaluation for repairs, and then charge an additional amount for maintenance?


  • 24 May 2016 9:31 AM
    Reply # 4036623 on 4035681

    I believe that regardless of the potential road uses and "fairness", you have to use the property assessed value however it is calculated by the municipality.  Folks in Tree Growth give up property rights (development, types of harvesting, etc.) in return for their reduced tax assessment.  As far as the 1% annual limit, I have read/heard at previous meetings with Cliff Goodall that the term road maintenance is a broad term to include all items approved by the road association, i.e., liability insurance, legal costs, and road maintenance/repairs---whatever is approved for the annual dues.  I believe many associations do have a caveat that any individual use of the road by a member that results in road damage beyond normal wear, can result in an additional charge to the member. 

  • 27 May 2016 4:02 AM
    Reply # 4042479 on 4035681
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    When someone asked me this question, I referred it to the MARA forum because it's a bit out of my area of expertise.  I have tried to figure out the tree growth laws, but still don't quite understand how they work.  Is a lot in tree growth first assessed as any other lot would be and then discounted, or is the assessment derived under an entirely different scheme?  Is this something that many road associations have considered - i.e., do you check the town's valuation of every lot to make sure you are not charging more than 1 percent of that amount?  Do you re-check every year to make sure no one has moved their lot into tree growth?  

    If a lot in tree growth can be as little as 10 acres, and its value under tree growth could be maybe $5,000, that would mean the maximum that could be charged for dues for that lot would be $50. If a small road association serves several lots in tree growth, that could severely restrict their funds.  Perhaps this is something that should be addressed through legislation?  Yes, the owner of the lot is restricted in what he can do with the land under tree growth, but road maintenance does not cost less because the land is in tree growth.  If there are insufficient funds to keep the road in repair, everyone will lose quality of access - even the lots in tree growth.  It seems it would be more fair to limit the amount of dues based on the value the lot would have if it were not in tree growth.  The land owner is already getting a considerable break on his taxes.  Why should other land owners who do not get this tax break have to have their road association dues raised to cover expenses because the value of the tree growth lots puts a very low cap on their dues payment, while the value of the non-tree growth lots puts the cap far higher?

  • 06 Jun 2016 2:20 PM
    Reply # 4060014 on 4035681

    Cliff Goodall replies: 

    For private statutory road associations the enabling statute at 23 MRSA Section 3102 has a limitation for the amount of the annual maintenance assessment. It states that it “may not exceed 1%  of an individual owner’s municipal property valuation”.

    The key to understanding this provision is the term “municipal property valuation”. Under Maine law this is the “just value” or as the statutes also sometimes call it and as the courts have applied it this is the “fair market value”.

    Under Maine law all property in Maine must have the “just value” determined as of April 1 each year. (Remember  Doomsday and the Doomsday Book?) As a result all property (the emphasis is on “all”) has a value assigned by the assessors for the land value and the buildings value. Added together you have the “just value” and the “municipal property valuation”. They are all listed in each municipality’s or unorganized township’s property tax record books and are public records. ( The Doomsday Books) Add them all up and you get the municipal valuation that is used for many things such as assessment against the municipality. Yes it also pays a property tax for example to the county. It is also used the determine state revenue sharing and other state and federal benefits which is why the Property Tax Division of the Maine Revenue Service monitors the process closely to be sure it is correctly applied and fair.

    THIS IS NOT THE TAXABLE VALUE NOR IS IT THE VALUE USED TO ASSESS PROPERTY TAXES.

    The property tax amount assessed against each property that is subject to assessment is determined AFTER all of the exemptions are deducted such as homestead exemptions, veteran’s, blind persons, tree growth, open space, farm, etc. which are deducted from the “municipal property valuation” which is the “just value” or the “fair market value”.

    Therefore when a road association goes to the municipal office to check the property records to see if the 1% limit of Section 3102 is exceeded by the annual road maintenance assessment, it needs to use the total amount of the land and building valuation before it is reduced by the various exemptions.

    It is interesting that the private road statute subjects all benefited property to the road maintenance fee assessment from statutory road associations without any exemptions and the “municipal property valuation” is set yearly as discussed above for all property. This suggests that the land of a charitable organization such as a land trust, church and even government owned property must pay the road maintenance assessment fee from a statutory road association even though it is exempt from pay property tax. One question just leads to another!



  • 06 Jun 2016 3:32 PM
    Reply # 4060106 on 4035681
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Thanks, Cliff - I will pass this information along.  This will be a big help to Road Associations that thought they were restricted to 1% of the tree growth evaluation.

                            The Maine Alliance for Road Associations


Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software