Log in



Maine Alliance for Road Associations

Winters Services

  • 13 Jun 2019 1:44 PM
    Message # 7577930

    Do most associations provide winter services such as plowing and sand8? 

    Some of our year-round members think we should even though the summer residents are the large majority. Winter services are currently excluded in our bylaws. 

  • 14 Jun 2019 12:49 AM
    Reply # 7578990 on 7577930
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    Some do, some don't.  It depends on the needs of the association.  One option that many associations use is to charge one rate for summer people and another for year-round residents.  That way you are not asking those who only use the road in summer to pay for a service that only benefits those who stay for the winter. 

    Other associations have enough members so the extra cost of snow removal, spread out over all the members, is not overly burdensome.  In one case where summer residents objected, it was pointed out to them that for year round maintenance, the cost per member was comparable to what it would cost just to plow a driveway.  It also gave them the option of using the road any time, plus it provided better security because the year-round residents kept an eye on the whole neighborhood. 

    If your association is "statutory," set up under 23 MRSA 3101, the statute only requires, " The determination of each owner's share of the total cost must be fair and equitable and based upon a formula provided for in the road association's bylaws or adopted by the owners at a meeting called and conducted pursuant to this section." 

    The Courts have said that any formula is fair and equitable so long as it is applied equally to everyone. So you could change your bylaws to cover winter maintenance, and use either the formula that everyone pays the same, or the formula that year round residents pay more, and as long as you are consistent about applying your rule, it conforms to the law.  But my guess is that since you say most are summer residents, they would be more likely to approve the first option.

  • 20 Jun 2019 8:59 AM
    Reply # 7589421 on 7577930

    Thank you for your thoughts. We are a statutory road association. It gets a bit more complicated because while almost all summer residents do not live in the area, a couple live in the area and use the road to access the pond for ice fishing or other winter recreation. The residents on the road want them to share in covering the plowing costs and they refuse because they say they use the road in winter only as a convenience and not as a requirement like those who reside on the road. The summer residents are very reluctant to get involved since we " don't have a dog in the hunt." The winter residents would like the dues enforcement power of the road association. To give you some numbers we have a total of 38 owners (26 summer, 10 year-round, 2 in-area). The 10 year-round residents often argue about when a plowing or sanding is necessary. Our association road commissioner, who is a year-round resident, is a minimalist and would make others unhappy if he was the plowing/sanding decision maker. I expect we will continue to vote against any changes to our by-laws supporting winter services. We will do essential winter maintenance as when our main culvert froze solid this winter and we took action to prevent erosion of the road.

  • 22 Jun 2019 11:05 PM
    Reply # 7602080 on 7577930
    Anonymous member (Administrator)

    I see why you have a problem!   The summer residents outnumber winter residents, so their will is most likely to carry on a vote.  I still think your best bet may be to devise a dues formula that fairly reflects who uses the road when. i.e. divide the cost of road maintenance (not counting snow removal) by the total number of residents, and that is the dues payment for summer residents.  Then divide the cost of snow removal by the number of year-round residents, and add that to the cost per member of road maintenance to get the dues payment for year-round residents.  The summer residents are less likely to object to winter maintenance if year-round residents bear the brunt of the cost of snow removal.  That wouldn't necessarily give you increased funds for snow removal, but it would give you some enforcement structure for getting all of the year-round residents to share the cost of winter maintenance. Maybe you could also have an in-between option where summer residents could pay a bit more if they want to be allowed occasional winter use.  The closer you can tie the amount of use to the amount of the fee, the more fair it will be, and the happier everyone will be in the long run.

                            The Maine Alliance for Road Associations

Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software